A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning potential neighbours over the construction of the wall in a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which includes attracted national awareness following an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier plus the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a hugely publicised authorized struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building functions at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to build their family dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore locations are subject matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in a very delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding in order to maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Times, a picture that has since come to be emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water all through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the site grew to become Just about the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of actions have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up covered in detail from the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute while in the authorized timeline.
On the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as created, goes outside of what was authorised and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning paperwork, maps, and situations attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is determined by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their very long-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply looking to create a household home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Specific Area of Conservation and say that all performs are actually carried out depending on Qualified advice and authorized strategies. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with moving into The ocean during a storm, don't change the fundamental facts.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for the predicament that lots of observers see as ever more widespread. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had previously been linked to regional advocacy on arranging and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from the sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-large h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by means of midsection-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both equally the Actual physical reality from the coastline along with the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely the outcome remains uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as built complies with preparing authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and preparing circumstances. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who have to Reside alongside one another extended after the authorized fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building works at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case extend outside of that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems for instance environmental protection and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of pure beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of the dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Irrespective of whether it'll in the long run be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.