A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among future neighbours in excess of the development of the wall at a coastal internet site inside a north Dublin suburb, a case which includes attracted national consideration subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of setting up breaches, environmental worries, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier and also the Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has evolved into a hugely publicised lawful battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above design operates at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and an organization director respectively, seek to construct their relatives household. The situation has become emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, where by growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. Based on the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their potential neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Street, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their preparing permission by creating a wall outside of the boundaries of their internet site, leading to an encroachment on a Exclusive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, as such spots are matter to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments might have lasting ecological outcomes, specifically in a delicate coastal ecosystem for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their arranging permission, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the correct posture. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion being an try and delay or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their see, an allegation that's been recurring in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal organizing disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary attempts through the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the website, In keeping with sworn evidence referenced while in the Irish Moments. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-substantial drinking water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions, a picture which has considering that develop into emblematic of your intensity of your dispute. These steps weren't merely symbolic; they had been meant to gather Visible proof of the wall’s place relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site within the sea Irish Times reported, describing how the two Adult men entered the water throughout serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the internet site grew to become The most putting descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that these kinds of steps have been cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall extended into a region affected by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was staying encroached on.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being lined in detail from the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 turned broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be aware of the qualifications and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard even further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders should be granted to halt development pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key instant in the lawful timeline.
In the core of the dispute is a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain that the wall, as made, goes beyond what was permitted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, continues to be called meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and circumstances hooked up to the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by issue for environmental defense and adherence to setting up legislation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving a private view, insisting alternatively that it's about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've described their long-standing connection to the area and Rene Collier and Paul Feely their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a couple just wanting to develop a household home in accordance With all the law. They deny which the wall encroaches over a Specific Space of Conservation and say that every one performs are actually carried out dependant on Expert assistance and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into The ocean during a storm, tend not to alter the fundamental specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions on how organizing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute over development of wall at coastal website happens to be a shorthand description for the predicament that many observers see as progressively common. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become additional contentious.
The Irish Periods short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-large h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by way of midsection-high drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning conditions. Yet the human ingredient continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Reside alongside one another prolonged after the lawful prices are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the situation prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the importance of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when basic issues like environmental safety and residence legal rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays a place of organic splendor and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre of the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Whether it is going to finally be altered, removed, or concluded as planned will count on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely proceed to seem in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent times.